Will Mueller report look the other way?

Special counsel Robert Mueller will not release his Russia/Trump collusion report until after the midterm elections, it was reported on Wednesday.

In another touch of irony Mueller will present his findings to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who assigned Mueller and determines what parts of the report Congress and the American people can see.

Due to Attorney General Jeff Sessions recusing himself from the Russian collusion probe, Rosenstein became the point person.

So let’s see what Mueller has done so far with this assignment.

He has brought assorted pre-election charges against campaign Trump associates that have nothing to do with the campaign. Paul Manafort, who Mueller flipped after pleading guilty to bank and tax fraud charges, allegedly testified on a Trump Tower meeting between the campaign and Russian operatives.

I believe the meeting consisted of Donald Trump Jr. and Jared Kushner.

So now let’s lay out what Mueller may not report or be able to release.

  • Will Mueller cite his former staffer and colleagues in perpetuating a fraud on the American people by taking a partisan, oppositional report and ramming it through the FISA court to get a warrant against an American citizen to spy on him?
  • Will Mueller cite Obama’s CIA Director John Brennan getting UK allies to spy on American citizens?
  • Will Mueller tell Congress that the Obama White House received daily intelligence briefings on the Trump campaign through these fraudulent spy warrants?
  • Will Mueller throw former colleague and FBI Director James Comey under the bus for his illegal activities?
  • Will Mueller discuss the topics discussed by then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch when she met with Bill Clinton in a “surprise meeting” on the tarmac at Phoenix airport?

Although I have only scratched the surface of the Democratic Party’s actions during the run up to the 2016 presidential election, that’s quite a laundry list of complaints for Mueller to look the other way on.

While I thought this time was going to be consumed with news of Democrats fraudulent acts during the 2016 election through the release of the declassified FISA documents, it appears the fix is in to use this information — right now — for political gain.

As I wrote earlier that Trump’s team may have used the Five Eyes revelations that UK spies violated Americans privacy to get Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to sign off on the new NAFTA agreement.

So from where I stand today, an October Surprise may not be in the offering this cycle. But one can hope can’t they.

Advertisements

First YouTube, now Facebook

Writing Wednesday morning on future proves past, I cited the YouTube outage Tuesday night to an April drop citing troubles with social media sites.

Well the next shoe just dropped as four large institutional investors in Facebook have put together an initiative to oust founder Mark Zuckerberg from his chairman role.

The investor group composed of two independent board members and New York City Comptroller Scott Stringer cite continuing security concerns unfolding. Violations of user data has brought Zuckerberg and the social media firm’s lawyers in front of Congress twice this year.

Let’s see if any other news from Silicon Valley’s tech titans comes out this week as further proof that future proves past.

What happen with the YouTube outage

Working off the premise I wrote about twice yesterday, that Hatch Act has muzzled most executive branch advisors during the run up to the midterm elections.

The irony is that we did not hear about the Hatch Act during the 2016 Presidential election as it dealt with the fictitious Russian collusion propaganda. Under the act CIA, FBI and the Office of Special Counsel have greater constraints than other executive branch agencies when it comes to pre-election activities.

So working under the premise that we have more than we know, the April 6th drop told of problems with the Internet and social media sites over a released image. Last night YouTube went down for over two hours in my area.

Q!xowAT4Z3VQ
>>922075
Pics will surface of Hussein holding AK47 in tribal attire.
One of many.
Net shut down.
Q
>>922142
Fake pic push by MSM.
Videos / backup.
Google kill.
YouTube kill. [my bold]
FB kill.
Twitter kill.
Yahoo kill.
Bing kill.
Instagram kill.
Net will be paused.
HAMMER.
On the clock.
Q

Not sure what was purged from the service or if it was hacked, but according to reliable news reports the outage was global, which I would think was probably a controlled take down from the inside. Makes sense that an exterior hack would not be able to effect global operations.

The April 6th drop spoke of a much wider outage of many different Internet sites, so let’s keep an eye on Facebook, Google search, Twitter and other social media sites to determine the reach of this drop.

Let’s also see on Wednesday who in the administration will speak up on the topic of Russian collusion and FISA investigation.

President Trump picks up on the wheels of justice move slowly narrative

As I wrote earlier Tuesday, has the Hatch Act limited what can be said from the Executive Branch in regards to the midterm elections.

Well the act has no effect on what the President or Vice President can say. Trump is hitting hard on Russian collusion and the dossier.

Just now President Trump tweeted this:

“Conflict between Glen Simpson’s testimony to another House Panel about his contact with Justice Department official Bruce Ohr. Ohr was used by Simpson and Steele as a Back Channel to get (FAKE) Dossier to FBI. Simpson pleading Fifth.” Catherine Herridge. Where is Jeff Sessions?

 

Is it really possible that Bruce Ohr, whose wife Nellie was paid by Simpson and GPS Fusion for work done on the Fake Dossier, and who was used as a Pawn in this whole SCAM (WITCH HUNT), is still working for the Department of Justice????? Can this really be so?????

Both of these tweets play off what was the last QAnon post on Oct. 9, which is four weeks prior to Election Day.

Again I give a huge disclaimer, that the QAnon board could see new drops in the next 5 minutes, but from where I sit, this could be the biggest confirmation that Q-Anon is/are in the White House and subject to the Hatch Act.

Has the Hatch Act quieted certain Executive Branch drops?

Is the enforcement of the Hatch Act another validation that the cryptic pronouncements of what has come to be known as the QAnon phenomenon?

Has the White House curtailed certain Executive Branch employees from engaging in political activity just four weeks before the election?

The last Q post was on Oct. 9th at 9:42 pm, which is four weeks before the midterm elections.However, I see no reference to timetable in the act to confirm that four weeks is the cut off for executive branch employees to comment of elections.

The last post is a wrap-up of all the actions taken against the Department of Justice and FBI in connection to the FISA documents.

On Friday, White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders had a complaint filed against her with the Office of Special Counsel by the left-wing partisan group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics for posting a photo on Twitter of her with Kanye West, who was wearing a MAGA hat, in the Oval Office.

The Office of Special Counsel adjudicates all violations of the Hatch Act and earlier this year determined that since the President has already declared he is running in 2020 all displays of Make America Great Again by executive branch employees violates the act.

The Act of course exempts the President and Vice President from speaking out on an election.

The Hatch Act, named for Senator Carl Hatch of New Mexico, was passed in 1939 and it originally prohibited:

  • use official authority or influence to interfere with an election
  • solicit or discourage political activity of anyone with business before their agency
  • solicit or receive political contributions (may be done in certain limited situations by federal labor or other employee organizations)
  • be candidates for public office in partisan elections
  • engage in political activity while:
    • on duty
    • in a government office
    • wearing an official uniform
    • using a government vehicle
  • wear partisan political buttons on duty

My theory could be proven wrong in the next hour, should there be another drop, but since the declassifying of the FISA warrant documents would prove among many other allegations that Obama DOJ and FBI officials violated the Hatch Act, some White House counsel may have said we should put a halt to these posts, if it is under our control.