Perhaps the Yellow Vest protests will lead to an EU Winter

The Paris “Yellow Vest” riots over the weekend has been going on for a month now with numbers growing.

The media blackout here continues with the narrative being the French do not like rising “fuel taxes”.

President Trump over the weekend exposed the bigger issue of what the French people are dealing with over President Emmanuel Macron’s extremist climate change policies.

Very sad day & night in Paris. Maybe it’s time to end the ridiculous and extremely expensive Paris Agreement and return money back to the people in the form of lower taxes? The U.S. was way ahead of the curve on that and the only major country where emissions went down last year! 

Macron, who chastised Trump at the Armistice Day celebration last month on the president’s nationalistic policies like tariffs, is facing his citizens wrath for taking the globalist view that the only way to change people’s behavior is to punish them through higher taxes.
The former Rothschild & Cie banker is being branded as an elitist who is taxing the poorer French people to fund his globalist agenda. While Macron backed off from raising fuel taxes for a few months, a reportedly, 136,000 protesters hit the streets of Paris this weekend to show the government that this is about his wider agenda.
Parisian shopkeepers, who rely on holiday shoppers, will be decimated as the French capital was on lockdown the past two weekends. The daytime peaceful protests are being followed up at night by marauding bands of younger unemployed men from just outside Paris looting storefronts as police forces are stretched to handle the daytime protests.
The Macron government, not facing election until 2022, however it has a difficult decision to make. Will it be able to lead this uber-globalist agenda such as the Paris Climate Accord and watch the namesake city burn or will the French people prevail to wrestle back control of their government?
This could be the start of the EU Winter, which like the Arab Spring some years ago, gave the people back some nationalistic control.

Climate on Wall St. over Trump nixing Paris Agreement

The US participation in the Paris Agreement, which is the United Nations-backed pact on reducing greenhouse gas emissions to combat global warming, was nixed last week, by the Trump Administration as it is written now.

First, let me say I do not agree that climate change is “settled science” since I am old enough to remember when climatologists said in the 1970’s that we were headed into an ice age due to human development .

Secondly, climates don’t change in decades, climate takes 10’s of centuries to work through its progressions. The climate science we are looking at now is similar to looking at one photograph of a marathon runner.

You have no context of how long the race is, or how the runner did in the race. It’s one step in a 26-mile race. And yet some scientist look at this photo and not only know who won the race, but also the time it took the runner to finish.

Thirdly, the climate cycles we have experienced over the last 50 years have all been attributed to man-made emissions whether it was drought or flooding, cold temperatures or warm temperatures, strong hurricanes or weaker storms.

It’s my belief that the sun and the reduction of sun spot activity over the last decade has more influence over our atmosphere than anything we are doing on Earth. However you don’t see that mentioned too much in this debate and I’ll get to why in a second.

So that’s my take on climate change and this is why I agree with the White House on not signing on to the pact as written.

One thing the Paris Agreement does do well is create one of the greatest wealth transfer in history. Through what’s called carbon credit trading the pact sets up an exchanged — run by Wall Street banks — to take cash from US firms and so they can by third-world carbon credits to offset the companies emissions.

It’s a tax on productivity, with Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and other firms taking its piece. Why do you think Goldman’s chief Lloyd Blankfein broke onto Twitter for the first time to denounce Trump’s decision?

Not for fear of warming, but because Goldman is working with former Vice President Al Gore and David Blood, who is the former chief of Goldman Sachs Asset Management, to jump-start this trading platform through their firm Generation Investment Management. And if the largest buyer of your credits is not in the market, how do you make money?

Why would Tesla boss Elon Musk quit the White House advisory role? His whole company is created and funded by no emission vehicles. And if there’s no subsidies or future carbon credits for you and I for his cars than why buy them.

You see the Paris accord is not only aimed at US companies, it will get down to you and I and how we “manage our own carbon footprint”, through additional government fees and taxes.

So why is science not looking at the solar cycle as a cause? How can you tax the sun?

While the Paris Agreement is a feel good issue — who wants to destroy the planet — its mechanisms and funding structures are too one-sided against the US. China has very little restrictions on growth and emissions, despite being the No. 1 consumer of coal in the world.

So for the White House to say no we want a better deal than ex-President Obama agreed to is not out of the question. Besides if this is a treaty, Congress would have to approve it, before Trump could sign off on it.