Reflecting further on the Hillary Clinton’s personal server(s) being accessed by the Chinese government, which I wrote about yesterday, I believe this is the smoking gun that could bring the marquee names in the Democratic Party to justice.
Let’s look at this server access from the perspective of Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner.
Weiner’s laptop, which was confiscated by the NYC police department in their investigation of his perverted pedophile predilection, contained emails between Abedin and Hillary.
Did it also contain information about access to server(s) for healthy contributions to the Clinton Foundation? Was this the reason there was a folder on Weiner’s laptop called “insurance”?
Could this “pay to play” access plan have been “scrubbed, bleached” by the Clinton camp and the only evidence of its existence reside only on the Weiner laptop?
Since the NYPD investigators — who looked into the laptop’s files — told sources that there was “damning criminal evidence” against Clinton, why did Obama’s DOJ chief Loretta Lynch or FBI’s James Comey look the other way, or at least in Comey’s case with blinders on?
As we learned when Federal District Judge Denise Cote unsealed the NYPD Weiner search warrant for the laptop on May 16, the NYPD wanted access to all the files. However in a separate search warrant from the FBI, it stated that they would limit their inquiry to only those email files.
So again we see Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page covering up for the Clinton campaign as best they could by limiting the probe to just emails on the Weiner laptop and not the “damning criminal evidence” files.
Despite the DOJ’s and FBI’s obfuscation in the matter, the probe did make FBI chief Comey announce two weeks prior to the 2016 election that he was opening a new probe into the Clinton server question after exonerating her in July of 2016 of just be sloppy.